Spot a wrong claim, send it in
Corrections, logged in public.
leapbuzz publishes claims, numbers, and dates that buyers act on. When something is wrong, we want it corrected fast and the change made visible. This page sets out the request process, the review timeline, and the public log of every correction we have applied.
Read and verify
Within 2 weeks
Source bar
Primary publishers
Logged corrections
0 to date
Reviewer
Senior practitioner
Corrections process in detail
1. Why this page exists
The leapbuzz site carries claims, dates, statistics, and platform-feature references that buyers and readers use to make decisions. We take those claims seriously enough to verify them on publish and to log every correction in public when one is needed. A correction policy that lives only in the editor's inbox is not a policy.
2. How to file a correction request
Email [email protected] with three things:
- The exact page URL where the claim appears.
- The specific claim, quoted verbatim from the page.
- The source you believe contradicts it (primary publisher and date if available).
Primary-source flags (regulator publications, platform-vendor official documentation, academic research) get prioritised. Anonymous flags are read but slower to action because we cannot follow up for clarification.
3. What happens next
- Within two weeks: a senior practitioner reads the flag, verifies the claim against primary sources, and replies. If the claim is verifiably wrong, we update the page, post a dated entry in the public log on this page, and bump
dateModifiedin the JSON-LD on the corrected page. - If the claim is correct as published: we reply with the source and reasoning. No public log entry is created in that case.
Note on timing: new-business enquiries through /contact get a reply within one business day. Corrections, privacy requests, and other editorial / legal enquiries are reviewed on a two-week cadence because they need primary-source verification, not a sales response.
4. The verification standard
We act on claims that are demonstrably wrong against a primary source. We do not action subjective disagreements with our stance or interpretation. The bar is factual accuracy, not editorial alignment.
Primary sources we use to verify:
- Regulator publications (.gov,.gov.sg,.gov.au,.gc.ca, EU bodies)
- Platform-vendor official documentation (support.google.com, business.facebook.com, etc.)
- Academic publishers (arXiv, ACM, peer-reviewed journals)
- Named research firms (McKinsey, Forrester, Gartner, IDC, Bain, eMarketer)
- Industry bodies (IMDA, IAB chapters, MRC)
5. Types of correction we make
Numeric correction
A statistic or magnitude on the page is wrong against the cited source. We update the number and re-verify the citation.
Date correction
A platform-vendor migration date or regulator-deadline date is wrong. We update with the current public-roadmap source and date the correction.
Attribution correction
A statistic is attributed to the wrong source or a quote to the wrong person. We update both attribution and source link.
Feature-claim correction
A platform-feature claim is wrong (a feature does not exist, is geo-restricted, or has been deprecated). We update the claim and the platform documentation reference.
6. Public correction log
Every applied correction is logged below with date, page URL, original claim, corrected claim, and source. The log is permanent: corrections do not get scrubbed once posted.
Status
No corrections logged yet.
The site went live in May 2026. New entries appear here as they happen, newest at the top, with full attribution to the source that prompted the change.
7. What we will not correct
Opinion, voice register, and brand positioning are editorial decisions, not factual claims. We do not action requests to:
- Soften tone or remove italic accents
- Drop named-competitor references or pivot positioning
- Remove a stance because it conflicts with a reader's view
- Add hedges to a position the reader disagrees with
If the request is about editorial direction rather than factual accuracy, the right page is the editorial policy.
8. Anonymous requests
We read anonymous flags, but they take longer to action because we cannot follow up for clarification. If you would prefer not to share your identity in the public log, say so in the email and we will action the correction without naming the source.
File a correction
Send the specific claim.
Include the page URL, the quoted claim, and the primary source you believe contradicts it. We read every flag and reply on the timeline above.
For editorial direction or tone disagreements, the right address is [email protected], not this one.
Corrections
Origin Pi Pte. Ltd.
60 Paya Lebar Road, #06-28
Paya Lebar Square
Singapore 409051
Last reviewed and re-verified . Every correction we apply lives on this page, permanently.