The bar every leapbuzz page passes
Editorial policy, in the open.
leapbuzz publishes regulated-sector marketing content for senior practitioners, product leaders, and CFOs. The discipline below sets the standard for source citations, claim verification, author attribution, voice, compliance posture, and the 90-day re-verification cycle. We hold every published surface to it.
Source threshold
Primary publisher only
Author byline
Every page, named
Honest-claims rule
Strict, no exceptions
Anti-AI-slop check
R-0018 nine tiers
Editorial policy in detail
1. What we publish
leapbuzz publishes consultancy content for marketing, product, business, and sales leaders in regulated sectors. Output ranges across:
- Performance marketing diagnostics and operating-model writing
- AI visibility, Generative Engine Optimisation (GEO) and Answer Engine Optimisation (AEO) citation analysis
- Channel-specific deep dives (Google, Meta, LinkedIn, TikTok, Programmatic, SEO, Microsoft)
- Sector-specific guidance for finance, insurance, fintech, government, telecom, travel, and adjacent regulated industries
- Founder commentary on AI adoption inside marketing teams
Everything we publish must clear the standards on this page before going live.
2. Source discipline
Every numeric claim ships with the primary publisher name and date in the same sentence. We do not publish a statistic without a source the reader can verify.
2.1 Approved primary sources
- Regulators:
.gov,.gov.sg,.gov.au,.gc.ca, EU member-state regulators (MAS, ASIC, OAIC, FTC, OSFI, Quebec CAI, Competition Bureau, IMDA, PDPC, others) - Platform vendors: Google (support.google.com, blog.google, developers.google.com, thinkwithgoogle.com, web.dev), Meta business properties, LinkedIn official documentation, Microsoft Advertising official documentation
- Academic publishers: arXiv, ACM, peer-reviewed journals
- Named research firms: McKinsey, Forrester, Gartner, IDC, Bain, eMarketer, Statista
- Industry bodies: IMDA, IAB chapters, MRC, recognised.org bodies
2.2 What we do not cite
- Competitor agency content or sponsored agency listicles
- Secondary blog aggregators or directory rankings
- Anonymous "industry reports suggest" without a named source
- AI-generated summary pages without a primary source upstream
3. The honest-claims rule
Sitewide rule
No invented clients, no invented numbers.
Only named, founder-confirmed clients appear on the site. Only verified metrics get published as numbers. Capability claims are explicit, for example: we run paid media across Google, Meta, LinkedIn, TikTok, and Microsoft. Outcome claims (a specific magnitude attributed to our work) require a source we can produce on request.
We do not publish anonymised wins or hypothetical case studies. We do not approximate when the verified number is not at hand. If a metric belongs in copy and we cannot back it, the metric does not appear.
5. Voice and anti-slop discipline
All published copy passes the R-0018 nine-tier anti-slop taxonomy before ship. Em-dashes: hard zero across every surface. Tier 1 vocabulary (the words that show up at 100-to-1 LLM-to-human frequency) does not appear in our copy. The full taxonomy is enforced by automated check on every build.
5.1 Voice register
"Informed operator": professional, opinionated, dry, measured. Peer-to-peer with senior buyers. No explainer-condescension. First-person plural for company voice; first-person singular for founder bylines.
5.2 Burstiness target
Sentence-length standard deviation at or above 8 across any 10-sentence window. Paragraph-length standard deviation at or above 4 sentences. ~15% of sentences non-complete (fragments, asides, questions) to avoid the LLM-monotone cadence.
5.3 Lived-experience signal
Every longform piece anchors with at least one specific anecdote per ~600 words: named place, named date, named person, named tool, named price, sensory detail. Generic claims are weak signals; specifics are un-fakeable.
6. Compliance posture
Financial-services content aligns with the regulator framework for each anchor market:
| Market | Reference frameworks |
|---|---|
| Singapore | MAS Guidelines on Fair Dealing, Financial Advisers Act Section 36, PDPA 2012, IMDA Telecommunications Act |
| Australia | ASIC Regulatory Guide 234, Privacy and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2024, ACMA |
| Canada | OSFI Guideline B-13, Quebec Law 25, PIPEDA, provincial regulators |
| United States | FTC dot-com Disclosures, SEC Marketing Rule, FINRA Rule 2210, OCC guidance, HIPAA for healthcare |
| Malaysia | PDP Commissioner Malaysia, Bank Negara Malaysia, Securities Commission |
Compliance disclaimers carry the date they were re-verified. We do not give legal advice; clients retain responsibility for sector-specific compliance through their own counsel.
7. The 90-day re-verification cycle
Every page is re-read every 90 days. dateModified in JSON-LD reflects the most recent re-verification, not the original publish date. Stale content (over 90 days since re-verification) is flagged and either renewed or unpublished. There is no archive of stale content quietly accumulating links.
8. Editorial independence
Affiliate arrangements, partnership disclosures, and commercial sponsorships do not influence editorial. Where a piece names a tool we earn referral fees on, we say so at the point of use. Vendor relationships do not exempt vendors from named criticism when the evidence supports it.
9. Corrections and reader flags
If a published claim looks wrong, file a correction request via the Corrections policy. Every applied correction is logged in public on that page with date, page URL, original claim, corrected claim, and source. We do not silently scrub mistakes after they have been pointed out.
Editorial questions (tone, stance, coverage direction) go to [email protected]. Factual flags go to [email protected].
Editorial line, in writing
Disagree with our take?
Editorial direction, tone, and stance questions get a reply from a named author. If you have a counter-argument with sources, we want to read it.
Factual flags belong on the Corrections page, not here. Different review workflow, different timeline.
Editorial
Origin Pi Pte. Ltd.
60 Paya Lebar Road, #06-28
Paya Lebar Square
Singapore 409051
Last reviewed and re-verified . The policy itself sits on the same 90-day cycle as every other published page.