Paid Search

Microsoft AI Max vs Google AI Max: what's switched on

Microsoft switched AI Max on for every new Search campaign, then removed Max CPC from new automated bidding setups on 1 October. Here is how the two AI Max products differ, and which Microsoft campaigns to test first.

Microsoft AI Max vs Google AI Max poster: two overlapping flat circles sharing a lens shape, with a small orange dial.

Bottom line

Microsoft AI Max, generally available since 27 August 2026, has Google's three features but switches on by default for every new Search campaign.

  • Google moved campaigns with legacy settings into AI Max during September 2026. Microsoft switches it on for new campaigns, and scheduled Google Import re-applies Google's setting on every sync, so an off switch in Microsoft alone does not hold.
  • Microsoft reports at least 8% more conversions, but per its own footnote only 10 of 44 experiments were statistically significant.
  • From 1 October 2026, Microsoft says, new non-portfolio Maximize Conversions, Conversion Value and Clicks campaigns can no longer set a Max CPC.
  • LinkedIn profile targeting on Search is the reason to run it; regulated brands keep text customization off until compliance agrees a review method.

Microsoft AI Max vs Google AI Max: same features, different ways in

If you built a Search campaign in Microsoft Advertising after 27 August 2026, AI Max is probably on. If you sync from Google Ads, switching it off in Microsoft may not stick: the next import can switch it back. And from 1 October, Microsoft says, a new Maximize Clicks campaign can no longer have a CPC ceiling at all.

Google and Microsoft sell the same three features under the same name. What differs is how each one gets into your account and what you can do about it. Here is that difference, what Microsoft's own numbers prove, and which campaigns to test first.

The three shared features, in plain words:

  • Search term matching decides which queries you pay for, beyond your keyword list.
  • Text customization writes extra ad lines that nobody on your team approves one by one.
  • Final URL expansion picks the landing page for each click.
How campaigns reach AI Max Google migrates existing campaigns; Microsoft defaults new ones on and inherits on Google Import. TWO ROUTES IN Google converts what you run. Microsoft defaults what you build. GOOGLE ADS 15 Apr 2026 Plan announced 1 to 30 Sep 2026 Legacy settings migrated Feb 2027 Dynamic Search Ads upgraded MICROSOFT 27 Aug 2026 On for new Search campaigns Every Google Import sync AI Max setting inherited 1 Oct 2026 No Max CPC on new non-portfolio automated bidding Dynamic Search Ads Supported, no end date inherits
Orange marks the two routes that switch Microsoft AI Max on by default. Sources: Google's April 2026 post; Microsoft's 27 and 31 August 2026 posts.

In Microsoft's words:

"AI Max will also be enabled by default for any new Search campaigns you create in Microsoft Advertising, though it can still be turned off at any time during campaign creation or afterwards."

Carolyn Chou, Director, Product Management, Microsoft Advertising, 27 August 2026
Google AI Max vs Microsoft AI Max for Search, from each platform's own pages (checked 6 October 2026)
DimensionGoogle AI Max for SearchMicrosoft AI Max
How campaigns get inLegacy settings migrated 1-30 September 2026; Dynamic Search Ads from February 2027On by default for new Search campaigns; inherited through scheduled Google Import
Where search term matching is switchedPer ad group, in ad group settingsAI Max on or off per campaign, at creation or later
Brand controlsInclusions at campaign and ad group level; exclusions at campaign levelInclusions and exclusions
Creative guardrailsText guidelines (beta): term exclusions and messaging restrictionsTerm exclusions now; prompt-based messaging guidelines "coming soon"
Mandatory wordingText disclaimers, guaranteed to show in the description line once approved, compatible with final URL expansionNone described in the 27 August post
Landing page controlsURL inclusions and exclusionsNone described in the 27 August post; audit with the search term landing page report
GeographyLocations of interest at ad group levelExisting campaign targeting
Report label"AI Max" match type, with a source column"AI optimized" match type
Dynamic Search AdsBeing retired into AI MaxSupported until further notice

Google's AI Max help page documents finer controls today, and one of Microsoft's is still "coming soon", so we would start narrower on Microsoft. For the Google-side decisions, see our AI Max auto upgrade checklist and the AI Max vs Performance Max guide.

Which Microsoft campaigns already have AI Max switched on

New Microsoft Search campaigns start with AI Max on, and scheduled Google Import copies Google's setting across. Existing campaigns are the exception.

For existing campaigns, Microsoft's 27 August post says auto-generated assets now appear as the text customization feature, and that this "doesn't opt you into the broader AI Max feature set." Check each campaign's AI Max panel rather than assuming nothing moved.

Imports carry the bigger surprise. The same post says Microsoft campaigns that match Google campaigns with AI Max on "will continue to inherit those settings during future syncs." Switch it off in Microsoft and the next sync can switch it back on.

Dynamic Search Ads (DSA) run the other way. Microsoft supports them "until further notice", and Google-upgraded DSA campaigns convert back to DSA on import. One campaign can then sit in two different setups, which breaks any cross-engine report that assumes they match.

Copilot-drafted campaigns are new campaigns too, so by Microsoft's wording they start with it on; our guide to Copilot in Microsoft Ads covers where review fits.

What Microsoft's 8% figure proves, and what it does not

Microsoft's launch post says advertisers saw "at least an 8% increase in conversions" against control campaigns with the features off. The footnote is more useful than the headline.

44

advertiser-run A/B experiments, global, June to August 2026 (Microsoft internal data)

~13.6%

spend-weighted conversion uplift across those 44, per Microsoft

10 of 44

statistically significant positive results, lower confidence bound 8.2%

10 of 44 experiments were significant wins One dot per experiment; 10 are significant positive results. MICROSOFT'S OWN TESTS Only 10 of 44 tests showed a statistically clear win. Test 1: clear win Test 2: clear win Test 3: clear win Test 4: clear win Test 5: clear win Test 6: clear win Test 7: clear win Test 8: clear win Test 9: clear win Test 10: clear win Test 11: no clear verdict Test 12: no clear verdict Test 13: no clear verdict Test 14: no clear verdict Test 15: no clear verdict Test 16: no clear verdict Test 17: no clear verdict Test 18: no clear verdict Test 19: no clear verdict Test 20: no clear verdict Test 21: no clear verdict Test 22: no clear verdict Test 23: no clear verdict Test 24: no clear verdict Test 25: no clear verdict Test 26: no clear verdict Test 27: no clear verdict Test 28: no clear verdict Test 29: no clear verdict Test 30: no clear verdict Test 31: no clear verdict Test 32: no clear verdict Test 33: no clear verdict Test 34: no clear verdict Test 35: no clear verdict Test 36: no clear verdict Test 37: no clear verdict Test 38: no clear verdict Test 39: no clear verdict Test 40: no clear verdict Test 41: no clear verdict Test 42: no clear verdict Test 43: no clear verdict Test 44: no clear verdict Clear positive (10) No clear verdict (34)
One dot per experiment. Source: Microsoft's 27 August 2026 post, footnote 4.

Ten clear wins out of 44. Our reading: the headline "at least 8%" matches the 8.2% lower bound of those ten, so it describes the significant tests, not all 44. Microsoft does not say so. The other 34 did not necessarily lose; small tests often cannot tell. Plan around that, because a test with no verdict wastes a quarter. So before you test, check whether your campaign is even big enough to see an 8% lift. Most are not.

Google's newer 7% figure, from its April 2026 upgrade post, compares the full suite with search term matching alone. It does not compare AI Max with no AI Max.

Illustrative example: is the test big enough?

A B2B campaign pair converts 120 times a month. Split evenly for 8 weeks, each arm collects about 111 conversions. By the formula below, that test can only reliably detect a lift of about 38% or more, so a real lift the size of Microsoft's would read as noise. Made-up round numbers; try your own.

About 111 conversions per arm. Smallest lift you can reliably see, per the formula: about 38%. Would Microsoft's 8% show up? No.

Formula: conversions per arm = monthly conversions x weeks / 4.33 / 2. Smallest detectable lift = 2.8 x square root of (2 / conversions per arm), a rough approximation for two equal arms at 95% confidence and 80% power. It ignores seasonality and conversion lag. Seeing 8% needs about 2,450 conversions per arm.

Microsoft also says uplift ran higher in campaigns built mostly on Exact and Phrase match. Google made a similar claim in May 2025: typically 14% more conversions or conversion value, and 27% where more than 70% of conversions came from exact or phrase keywords (Google internal data). Tightly built accounts hold the most unclaimed queries, so they test best.

So test on your busiest non-brand campaign, or accept that a small one only catches large effects. Our incrementality testing guide covers the sizing in more depth.

What changed on 1 October: no Max CPC on new automated campaigns

From 1 October 2026, Microsoft says, new non-portfolio Microsoft Advertising campaigns can no longer set a Max CPC (maximum cost per click) on three automated bid strategies. Rollouts vary, so check your account. Microsoft announced it in its 31 August 2026 product roundup:

  • Maximize Conversions with a target CPA (cost per acquisition)
  • Maximize Conversion Value with a target ROAS (return on ad spend)
  • Maximize Clicks

Put the two August announcements together and the riskiest new campaign this quarter is obvious: a Maximize Clicks Search campaign built in October starts with AI Max on, broader queries, and no CPC ceiling. Catch that pairing before launch.

Campaigns created before 1 October that already used Max CPC keep it. Portfolio bid strategies keep it for new and existing campaigns. Microsoft's reason: a cap overrides your CPA or ROAS target and causes missed outcomes, "even when the cap is above average CPC".

On target CPA and target ROAS this brings Microsoft in line with Google, which already limits those bid caps to portfolio strategies. Maximize Clicks is different. Google still allows a cap there on a standard campaign; Microsoft no longer does for new ones.

The removal bites unevenly. On target CPA the target already prices the click: roughly, a click is worth up to the target CPA times the expected conversion rate. Illustrative numbers only: 150 units at a 2% conversion rate points to about 3 units per click, cap or no cap. Maximize Clicks has no target, so the cap was the only price control.

A Q4 launch that needs a CPC ceiling: the options since 1 October 2026 (our decision rule)
SetupMax CPC available?When we would use it
Existing campaign created before 1 October that already had a capYes, keptReuse it if it fits, after confirming in your account that adding ad groups keeps the cap. Do not copy it: by Microsoft's wording, a copy is a new campaign
New campaign on a portfolio bid strategyYesThin margins, a new market, low conversion volume
New standard campaign on target CPA, target ROAS or Maximize ClicksNoOnly with AI Max off, a conservative daily budget and a written review date

Microsoft is right that caps fight targets when conversion data is steady. Thin B2B accounts rarely have it, so for them the portfolio route is the practical answer.

Is Microsoft AI Max worth running for B2B, insurance and finance?

Yes for most B2B and insurance marketing teams, because Microsoft Search campaigns can use LinkedIn profile targeting, so the expanded queries land inside an audience you chose.

The 31 August roundup made Job Seniority generally available for Search campaigns and Audience ads, with 10 standard levels, from Entry to CXO. A commercial insurer selling to finance heads can aim expanded queries at Director level and above. The mechanics are in our piece on Microsoft Ads and LinkedIn audience data. And since Microsoft's 30 September roundup, a LinkedIn company list can hold 10,000 names, up from 1,000.

That changes what query expansion is worth. On Google, the main defence against junk queries is the negative list. Microsoft gives you a second fence: company or seniority targeting on top.

The risk sits in the creative and the routing. Microsoft's term exclusions block named words in AI-generated assets, and generated assets can be reviewed in the asset report. Final URL expansion can send a searcher to a page never cleared for that query, such as a product page written for another market.

The warning for regulated advertisers

Microsoft's 27 August 2026 post, as read on 6 October 2026, describes term exclusions and after-the-fact review in the asset report. It describes no step where a person approves generated text before it serves, and a block list cannot catch a non-compliant phrase nobody thought to list. If your rules require copy to be approved before publication, keep text customization off until your compliance team agrees how generated text will be reviewed. This is marketing practice, not legal or compliance advice, and the rules differ in each market.

Search term matching is easier to govern, because its output is a query list you can read and exclude. For a regulated product the list is read after the ad serves, hence the holdout-only row below. Write the rule for keeping it before the test starts. Illustrative rule: once "AI optimized" rows reach 30 CRM-qualified leads, if their cost per qualified lead runs above 1.25 times the keyword rows', matching goes off in that campaign. Set your own thresholds with finance.

Setting up Microsoft AI Max on purpose: seven steps

Seven steps, in the order our search advertising team runs them. Steps 1 and 2 guard against the two default-on routes in the timeline, and they are the ones teams skip.

  1. Audit the Google Import scheduleList every synced campaign with AI Max on in Google. Where you want it off in Microsoft, fix it on the Google side or pull the campaign from the schedule.
  2. Change the launch templateAdd a line: "AI Max: on or off, and why". With default-on, silence means yes.
  3. Check Q4 launches against the Max CPC tableAny launch that needs a ceiling goes onto a portfolio strategy, or into a capped pre-October campaign once you have confirmed the cap survives your edits.
  4. Write the term exclusion list per marketStart from compliance's prohibited-claims list and add competitor names. For regulated products it supplements the review above; it does not replace it.
  5. Set brand exclusionsKeep brand queries in the brand campaign, so any uplift you report is non-brand uplift.
  6. Test one campaign, on versus offSame bid strategy and budget in both arms, as in Microsoft's own tests. Microsoft's optimization experiments went generally available on 30 September; check AI Max can be the variable. Size it with the calculator above and judge it on CRM-qualified conversions.
  7. Read three reports weekly for the first monthSearch terms filtered to "AI optimized", the asset report, and the search term landing page report.
Where we switch each Microsoft AI Max feature on first (our heuristic, not platform guidance)
CampaignSearch term matchingText customizationFinal URL expansion
BrandOffOffOff
Mature non-brand, mostly Exact and PhraseTest here firstAfter the exclusion list existsOnly if every eligible page is cleared for paid traffic
Low-volume B2B with LinkedIn targetingOn, inside the LinkedIn layer; expect no test verdictOff until the exclusion list existsOff
Regulated product (insurance, lending, investments)Holdout test onlyOff until compliance agrees a review methodOff; route manually
Synced by scheduled Google ImportDecide on the Google side; the setting is inherited on each sync

Microsoft's prompt-based messaging guidelines were still "coming soon" when we checked on 6 October. When they ship, the regulated row is worth revisiting.

Do this first

Ten minutes this week: open the Google Import schedule and, for each synced campaign, write down whether AI Max should be on in Microsoft. Then open every Search campaign created since 27 August and read its AI Max panel. If you cannot say why each one is on, Microsoft decided for you. Fix the Google side before the next sync, or it will decide again.

Frequently asked questions

Answers reflect Microsoft Advertising and Google Ads documentation as checked on 6 October 2026.
Is Microsoft AI Max turned on by default?

For new Search campaigns, yes. Microsoft's 27 August 2026 announcement says AI Max is enabled by default for any new Search campaign created in Microsoft Advertising, and you can turn it off during campaign creation or afterwards.

For existing campaigns, auto-generated assets now appear as text customization, which Microsoft says does not opt you into the broader AI Max feature set. Check each campaign's AI Max panel anyway. With scheduled Google Import, campaigns with AI Max on in Google Ads carry that setting into Microsoft on each sync.

What is the difference between Microsoft AI Max and Google AI Max?

The two share feature names, but Google and Microsoft differ on defaults and on the controls around them. Google moved campaigns using automatically created assets or campaign-level broad match into AI Max during the 1-30 September 2026 window, with Dynamic Search Ads due in February 2027.

Microsoft turns it on for new Search campaigns, inherits it through Google Import and keeps Dynamic Search Ads. Google's controls are finer, including per-ad-group matching and URL exclusions. And from 1 October 2026, Microsoft says, new non-portfolio automated campaigns can no longer set a Max CPC.

Does Microsoft AI Max actually increase conversions?

Microsoft's own tests say it can, but only 10 of 44 experiments showed a statistically significant positive result. Per the 27 August 2026 announcement, advertisers saw at least 8% more conversions against control campaigns, from 44 advertiser-run A/B experiments between June and August 2026, with spend-weighted uplift near 13.6%. Treat that as a reason to test. Per our rough sample-size rule, seeing an 8% lift reliably takes about 2,450 conversions in each arm, so low-volume accounts should judge on CRM-qualified leads and expect only large effects to show.

What is the Max CPC change in Microsoft Advertising on 1 October 2026?

From 1 October 2026, Microsoft says, new non-portfolio campaigns on target CPA, target ROAS or Maximize Clicks can no longer set a Max CPC. It announced the change in its 31 August 2026 product roundup. Campaigns created before then that already used Max CPC keep it, and portfolio bid strategies keep the setting. If a Q4 launch depends on a CPC ceiling, the cleanest route is a portfolio bid strategy. Microsoft does not say what else you can change inside a capped older campaign, so test one edit before you build a launch there.

Should insurance and financial services brands use Microsoft AI Max?

Yes, with limits: start with search term matching inside LinkedIn profile targeting, and keep text customization off where copy must be pre-approved. Per Microsoft's 31 August 2026 roundup, Job Seniority added 10 levels to that targeting.

Microsoft's 27 August post describes term exclusions and review in the asset report, but no step where a person approves generated text before it serves. Keep it off until compliance agrees a review method. This is marketing practice, not legal advice.

Does Google Import copy AI Max settings into Microsoft Advertising?

Yes. Per Microsoft's 27 August 2026 announcement, settings now carry over through Google Import, and on scheduled imports the matching Microsoft campaigns keep inheriting them on every future sync. Switching the feature off only on the Microsoft side does not stick.

Change it in Google Ads, or remove that campaign from the import schedule. Google-upgraded Dynamic Search Ads campaigns are the exception: they arrive as standard Dynamic Search Ads. Before the next sync, list each synced campaign with the setting you want on each engine.

Related

Work with Leapbuzz

Test Microsoft AI Max on a holdout before it spends the Q4 budget

Leapbuzz runs search advertising across Microsoft Advertising and Google Ads for businesses in Singapore, Malaysia, Australia, the US and Canada. Before AI Max touches a live campaign, we build the term exclusion list with your compliance team, then judge the holdout on CRM-qualified leads rather than the platform's dashboard.

Plan an AI Max test with us